Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4380 13
Original file (NR4380 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

BUG
Docket No: 4380-13
7 April 2014

 

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the
United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 1 April 2014. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy and entered a period of active duty on
18 May 1998. Your entrance urinalysis tested positive for the
wrongful use of amphetamine/methamphetamine. You were then
notified that you were being administratively separated due to:
erroneous enlistment (drug abuse). On 5 June 1998, you were
administratively separated with an uncharacterized entry level
of separation due to erroneous enlistment (drug abuse), and
assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code.
In its review of your application, the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
desire to change your reentry code. However, the Board
concluded that your reentry code should not be changed due to
your drug abuse, failure to complete recruit training, and non-
recommendation for retention. In view of the above, your

application has been denied. The names and votes of the members
of the panel will be furnished upon request.

You are advised that the Navy Reserve does not issue a
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. (DD Form
214) upon separation. You were correctly issued a Record of
Discharge, Release from Active Duty, or Death (Navy Personnel
601-14) upon your separation, a copy of which you enclosed with
your application.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Acting Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR3571-13

    Original file (NR3571-13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A-three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ‘application on 11 February 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board: Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, . On 5...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07008-00

    Original file (07008-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. on the urinalysis you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR0729 14

    Original file (NR0729 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 July 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You must first apply to the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 02921-07

    Original file (02921-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2008. As a result, on 4 September 1998, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of erroneous enlistment due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 12641-10

    Original file (12641-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 February 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4974 13

    Original file (NR4974 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR6610 13

    Original file (NR6610 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application 8 July 2014. on 22 July 1993, you received an OTH characterization of service discharge due to misconduct (drug abuse), and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR5192 13

    Original file (NR5192 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2014. You exercised your procedural right have your case heard by an administrative discharge board (ADB). On 11 December 2012, you received a general under honorable conditions characterization of service due to misconduct, and were assigned an RE-4 (not recommended for retention) reentry code.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2932 14

    Original file (NR2932 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with 211 matexiai submitced in suppost thereof, your naval record, and appiicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In this regard, individuals separated within the first 180 days of service are discharged without a characterization of service and you were assigned the appropriate reentry code based on your circumstances. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09395-07

    Original file (09395-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...